If the company is healthy
Repayment is an ordinary transaction that follows the agreed terms and does not create taxable income for the shareholder.
Companies · Dealings with shareholders
Putting money into your own company looks like the simplest thing in the world. But the way you do it changes whether it can be paid back, how it is taxed and, if things go badly, where you stand as a shareholder compared with the other creditors.
When a shareholder puts money into the company, they can do it as a loan (money the company will have to pay back) or as capital, giving up the right to be repaid. They are two completely different transactions.
| Shareholder loan | Capital contribution (versamento in conto capitale) | |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | A debt owed by the company to the shareholder | Equity |
| Repayment | Due, according to the agreement | Not due, unless distributed |
| Subordination | Applies in the cases set by law | Does not apply |
| Interest | Possible, with a presumption that interest is charged | Not provided for |
| Effect on equity | None | Strengthens it |
| Relevance for balance sheet ratios | Worsens the debt ratio | Improves it |
This is the point that makes a shareholder loan less secure than it looks. The law provides that, in certain circumstances, repayment to the shareholder is subordinated to the other creditors.
It is there to block a shortcut.
The loan itself does not generate income, but the interest does, and the presumption that interest is charged needs to be managed.
There are only a few formalities, but they must all be followed, because they are the proof of what the transaction is.
Minutes of the shareholders' meeting or a private written agreement that classifies the transaction and states the amount, the interest and the terms of repayment.
The payment must be traceable and the reference must match the classification chosen. It is the first document anyone looks at in a tax audit.
The account must be opened correctly: a debt owed to shareholders for a loan, a reserve for a capital contribution.
The notes to the financial statements must report the shareholder loans and their terms.
This is the moment when mistakes made on the way in come to light.
Repayment is an ordinary transaction that follows the agreed terms and does not create taxable income for the shareholder.
Subordination can prevent repayment, and a repayment already made may have to be paid back.
The repayment risks being reclassified as a distribution of profits, with tax consequences for the shareholder.
The loan remains a claim against the company, separate from the value of the holding: it must be dealt with separately in the transfer of shares.
The shareholder who made the loan ranks as a creditor, subject to subordination. See liquidation.
The loan turns into equity and increases the tax cost of the holding, under that transaction's own rules.
They are almost always mistakes of form that turn into problems of substance.
Yes, an interest-free loan is fully legitimate. It must however be expressly stated as such in a resolution or a written agreement, because otherwise there is a presumption that interest is charged.
With the right paperwork the company deducts no interest and the shareholder declares no investment income: the situation is clean for both.
A capital contribution goes into equity and cannot be repaid like a debt: it strengthens the company and improves the ratios that banks and other parties look at.
A loan remains a debt, which the company must repay, but which in situations of imbalance can be subordinated to the other creditors. The choice depends on how much you need to be able to get that money back.
Repayment of the capital lent is not income and does not have to be declared. Only any interest counts as income.
For this to be beyond dispute, though, it must be clear that the money really was a loan. Without paperwork, the repayment risks being reclassified as a distribution of profits, taxed accordingly.
It means that, in a crisis, the shareholder who made the loan is paid only after all the other creditors have been paid.
And if repayment took place in the year before the declaration of insolvency, the shareholder must pay back what they received. That is why, in a company that is already imbalanced, contributing capital is often more honest and safer than lending.
A bank transfer with no payment reference and no resolution becomes whatever the party with an interest in saying so claims it is. Better to put it in writing first.