Makes sense
Low-risk service businesses, between partners with a well-established relationship of trust, with profits drawn in full and modest personal incomes.
Businesses · Company forms
They cost little, can be set up quickly and are transparent for tax purposes. In return they ask for something not everyone is willing to give: the personal and unlimited liability of the partners for the debts of the partnership.
Both are partnerships and they share almost everything: formation, taxation, contributions, compliance. The difference lies in the structure of liability.
In an SNC (società in nome collettivo, a general partnership) all partners are jointly and severally liable without limit for the obligations of the partnership, and all normally have management powers.
In an SAS (società in accomandita semplice, a limited partnership) two categories coexist: the accomandatari (general partners), who manage and are liable without limit, and the accomandanti (limited partners), who are liable only up to the share they contributed but cannot carry out acts of management.
It means that the partnership's creditors, once its assets are exhausted, can go after the personal assets of the partners with unlimited liability: bank accounts, property, salaries.
Not every business carries the same risk.
A partnership does not pay income tax. The income it produces is attributed to the partners in proportion to their profit shares, and each partner declares it together with their other income.
The income is attributed regardless of distribution: the partner is taxed on their share of income even if that profit stays in the partnership and is not drawn.
| Aspect | Partnership | Limited company |
|---|---|---|
| Income tax on the entity | None: pass-through | IRES (corporate income tax) on the income produced |
| Taxation of profit for the partner | Always, even if not distributed | Only if distributed, as a dividend |
| Rate | Progressive, added to the partner's other income | Flat rate paid by the company |
| Losses | Attributed to the partners and usable under the rules | Stay with the company |
| IRAP (regional tax on productive activities) | Due under the general rules | Due under the general rules |
| Separation of assets | Imperfect | Complete |
Every partner who works in the partnership on a habitual and predominant basis must register with the social security scheme that corresponds to the activity carried out.
Formation is simpler than for an SRL (limited liability company) and noticeably cheaper, but it still requires a notarial deed or an authenticated private agreement.
Drawn up by the notary, it contains the firm name, the business purpose, the contributions, the profit shares and the management powers.
Registration of the deed and entry in the Registro Imprese (the Companies Register), which makes the partnership and the partners' powers public.
Partita IVA (Italian VAT number), INPS registration of the working partners, an INAIL position (workplace accident insurance) where needed.
SCIA (certified notice of start of activity) or permits for the activities that need them, a PEC address (Italian certified email), opening the partnership bank account.
The comparison with the SRL has no single answer. These are the profiles where a partnership remains the right choice, and those where it does not.
Low-risk service businesses, between partners with a well-established relationship of trust, with profits drawn in full and modest personal incomes.
Continuing a family business already under way, where the structure is established and the risk is known and limited.
Businesses with significant debt exposure, stock, employees, or a risk of disputes with customers.
Projects that expect investors to come in or rapid growth: the SRL is the form the market expects.
High profits you want to reinvest: pass-through taxation taxes them in the hands of the partners anyway.
The SAS as a structure to separate whoever puts in the capital from whoever manages, subject to the ban on interference.
They can work within the partnership, but they cannot carry out acts of management or negotiate or conclude business in the name of the partnership without a special power of attorney for individual transactions.
Breaching the ban means losing the benefit of limited liability towards all the partnership's creditors, not only for the transaction concerned.
Yes, conversion is an ordinary and frequent operation, typically when the business grows and unlimited liability becomes unsustainable.
It requires a notarial deed, a formal valuation report on the assets and an assessment of the tax effects. It needs planning, but there are no obstacles in principle.
Yes. Pass-through taxation attributes the income to the partners in proportion to their profit shares, regardless of whether it is actually distributed.
That is why, in partnerships, attributing the income is almost always accompanied by a distribution at least equal to the taxes that result from it.
Less, mainly because there is no requirement to file financial statements in the form required for limited companies, and the company compliance structure is lighter.
The gap has, however, narrowed over time. Today the liability profile weighs much more in the choice than running costs do.
A business with few debts and secure margins is one thing. One with stock, suppliers and bank credit lines is another.