Sole proprietorship
How the simplest form works.
OpenVAT numbers · Legal form
The question of SRL or sole proprietorship in Italy almost always comes up at the same moment: when the business starts to work. The answer depends on five variables, and only one of them is the tax saving.
Anyone who reaches this question thinking only about taxes is doing half the reasoning. The full comparison rests on five levels, and each of them can decide the choice on its own.
In a ditta individuale (sole proprietorship) you are liable with all your personal assets. In an SRL (Italian limited liability company) the risk is, in principle, limited to the capital contributed.
A sole proprietorship is taxed on a transparent basis, at progressive rates. An SRL pays corporate income tax, and the shareholder pays only on what they draw.
The base for social security contributions differs in the two cases, and the result is not a foregone conclusion: it depends on how pay is structured.
An SRL costs more: formation, full accounting, annual accounts, filing, Chamber of Commerce fees, corporate formalities.
Banks, corporate clients, larger suppliers and public calls for funding look at the legal form. It is a real factor, not just a matter of image.
The substantial difference is not about tax: it is about assets. In a sole proprietorship there is no separation between the business's assets and your own: your home, your accounts and your earnings answer for the business's debts.
In an SRL the separation exists. It is not absolute, though: personal sureties required by banks, certain liabilities of directors and some tax obligations can still reach your personal assets.
A sole proprietorship is taxed on a transparent basis: all the profit is your income, at progressive rates, even if you leave it in the business. An SRL pays a proportional tax on its own income; what reaches you as a dividend is subject to a further withholding tax.
From this follows the rule that steers the choice: if you draw all the profit, the sole proprietorship is often competitive; if you leave part of it in the business, the SRL starts to make sense.
| Aspect | Sole proprietorship | SRL |
|---|---|---|
| Tax on profit | Progressive, on the whole profit | Proportional, paid by the company |
| Profit left in the business | Still taxed on the owner | Taxed only on the company |
| Profit drawn | No further tax | Withholding tax on the dividend |
| Owner's pay | Not deductible: it is not a cost | The director's pay is deductible |
| Personal tax deductions | Can be set against business income | Can be set only against director's pay or other income |
| Regime forfettario | Available if the requirements are met | Not applicable |
| Losses | Usable under the rules for business income | Carried forward by the company |
Social security contributions often weigh more than tax, and the two forms calculate them differently.
That an SRL wipes out contributions. It does not.
An SRL has a fixed running cost that a sole proprietorship does not. It has to be taken into account because you pay it every year, whatever the business does.
| Item | Sole proprietorship | SRL |
|---|---|---|
| Formation | Chamber of Commerce filing | Notarial deed and related formalities |
| Capital | No requirement | Share capital to be paid in |
| Accounting | Simplified in most cases | Full accounting required |
| Annual accounts | Not required in company form | Preparation, approval and filing |
| Chamber of Commerce fee | Reduced amount | Higher amount |
| Corporate formalities | None | Meetings, minutes, company books |
| Organisational structures | Not required in company form | Legal requirement |
| Closing down | Closing the partita IVA (Italian VAT number) | Liquidation and deregistration |
There is no universal threshold, but there are recurring signs. When two or more of them occur at the same time, the switch is at least worth assessing with the figures in front of you.
There is no threshold that suits everyone, because the result depends on how much profit you draw, your social security scheme and your other income.
The practical criterion is this: an SRL starts to make sense when a substantial part of the profit can stay in the business. If you draw everything each year, the double layer of tax reduces or cancels the advantage.
In principle yes, for the company's ordinary obligations. In practice there are three frequent exceptions: personal sureties required by banks, a director's liability for mismanagement (mala gestio) and certain tax and contribution obligations.
The protection is real but not absolute, and it has to go hand in hand with proper management. A badly run SRL protects nobody.
No, the regime forfettario is reserved for individuals. An SRL applies the ordinary rules for business income.
Be careful with the reverse too: anyone who controls an SRL carrying out an activity linked to the one they carry out individually is excluded from the flat-rate scheme for their own position.
The typical operation is contributing the business to a newly formed company, with a sworn valuation report. Between preparation, the deed and the formalities, think in terms of a few weeks.
The longest part is not the deed: it is transferring contracts, permits and banking relationships to the new company. It needs planning so the business is not interrupted.
The useful question is not how much tax the SRL pays, but how much of what you earn you need to live on. A round-number example shows where the difference between the two models really lies.
Read the articleWe need the expected profit, how much of it you draw, the kind of clients you have and your level of debt. With these figures the choice stops being a matter of opinion.